Mast Quadrant-assisted minimally invasive modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single incision versus double incision / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>The concept of minimally invasive techniques is to make every effort to reduce tissue damage. Certainly, reducing skin incision is an important part of these techniques. This study aimed to investigate the clinical feasibility of Mast Quadrant-assisted modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with a small single posterior median incision.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>During the period of March 2011 to March 2012, 34 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar disease underwent the minimally invasive modified TLIF assisted by Mast Quadrant with a small single posterior median incision (single incision group). The cases in this group were compared to 37 patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar disease in the double incision group. The perioperative conditions of patients in these two groups were statistically analyzed and compared. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and sacrospinalis muscle damage evaluation indicators before operation and 3, 12 months postoperation were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 31 and 35 cases in the single incision and double incision groups, respectively, completed at least 12 months of systemic follow-up. The differences in perioperative conditions between the two groups were not statistically significant. The incision length of the single incision group was significantly shorter than that of the double incision group (P < 0.01). The ODI and VAS scores of patients in both groups improved significantly at 3 and 12 months postoperation. However, these two indicators at 3 and 12 months postoperation and the sacrospinalis muscle damage evaluation indicators at 3 months postoperation did not differ significantly between the two groups (P ≥ 0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Mast Quadrant-assisted modified TLIF with a small single posterior median incision has excellent clinical feasibility compared to minimally invasive TLIF with a double paramedian incision.</p>

Ankle fusion with a retrograde locked intramedullary nail for sequela of lower extremity compartment syndrome / 中华创伤杂志(英文版)

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the value of ankle fusion with a retrograde locked intramedullary nail in the treatment of sequela of lower extremity compartment syndrome.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Thirty-five cases of equinus deformity follow-ing tibiofibular compartment syndrome treated by means of ankle fusion with a retrograde locked intramedullary nail from January 2001 to December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. The complications, the time needed for bony fusion of the ankle joint assessed by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray photographs as well as patients'subjective evaluation were recorded and analysed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Among the 35 patients, 15 had previously undergone surgical treatment twice on the same limb, 13 had thrice and 7 had to be operated on four times before ankle fusion. An anterior midpoint approach to the ankle joint was adopted in 29 cases, while anterior midpoint approach plus a small incision on the posterior ankle joint was made in 17 cases, whereas lateral approach in 6 cases. Tarsus joint fusion was performed on 4 cases. The follow-up period ranged 6-124 months, averaged 40.6 months. Bone grafting was not performed in this series. Preoperative tibial shaft fracture occurred in one patient and was healed after conservative treatment. Incision dehiscence located at previous Achilles tendon incision was found in two patients. As a result, one received an intramedullary nail emplacement at calcaneoplantar part while the wound at anterosuperior part of the other one was healed by dressing change. Two patients failed to bony union 5 months postoperatively, in which one healed 10 weeks after retrieval of proximal tibial nail and another by iliac grafting. Terminal necrosis of the toe due to blood supply dysfunction was not found in this series. All the patients were satisfied with the ankle joint function postoperatively. The time for bony union on X-rays was 9.8 weeks on average. Except for one patient who demanded removal of intramedullary nail, all the intramedullary nails were not retrieved at the end of follow-up. Nail breakage happened in one patient and no other breakage or backing out of the nail was found.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Lower extremity compartment syndrome and residual ankle deformity often extremely impact ambulation and are hard to deal with because several pathologic phenomena might exist in these patients, for instance, poor skin conditions due to repeated preexisting surgery; poor perfusion in distal limbs following blood vascular injury; reflux limitation and long-term limb swelling due to muscle strength disturbance; osteoporosis as a result of long-term immobilization or limb disuse. Ankle fusion with a retrograde locked intramedullary nail is an optimal protocol to solve these clinical symptoms and rather ensures a definite fusion and firm fixation to these patients with simple manipulation and few complications.</p>

Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>In recent years, a variety of minimally invasive lumbar surgery techniques have achieved desirable efficacy, but some dispute remains regarding the advantages over open surgery. This study aimed to compare minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor with open surgery in terms of perioperative factors, postoperative back muscle function, and 24-month postoperative follow-up results.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From September 2006 to June 2008, patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spine disease who were not responsive to conservative treatment were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to undergo either minimally invasive surgery (MIS, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor, 41 cases) or open surgery (improved transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, 38 cases).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The MIS group had longer intraoperative fluoroscopy time than the open surgery group, and the open surgery group had significantly increased postoperative drainage volume and significantly prolonged postoperative recovery time compared with the MIS group (P < 0.05 for all). MRI scanning showed that the T2 relaxation time in the multifidus muscle was significantly shorter in the MIS group than in the open surgery group at 3 months after surgery (P < 0.01). Surface electromyography of the sacrospinalis muscle showed that the average discharge amplitude and frequency were significantly higher in the MIS group than in the open surgery group (P < 0.01). The Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale scores were better at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively than preoperatively in both groups. Both groups of patients met the imaging convergence criteria at the last follow-up.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>MIS can effectively reduce sacrospinalis muscle injury compared with open surgery, which is conducive to early functional recovery. In the short term, MIS is superior to open surgery, but in the long term there is no significant difference between the two procedures.</p>

Value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging measurements in thoracic percutaneous vertebroplasty using unilateral / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Increasing the successful puncture rate of the percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in thoracic vertebral compression fracture by unilateral puncture is a problem that spinal surgeons are trying to solve. The aim of this study was to assess the value of preoperative MRI imaging measurements for PVP using a unilateral puncture.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>We performed a retrospective, comparative study of two groups of osteoporotic thoracic vertebral compression fracture patients who had received a PVP using a unilateral puncture. Group A (22 patients with 27 valid vertebrae) received PVP with a unilateral puncture between October 2005 and February 2007. Group B (18 patients with 24 valid vertebrae) received a routine MRI imaging measurements before a PVP between March 2007 and June 2008. We determined the target area to puncture based on the preoperative MRI cross-sectional images of vertebra. The PVP used a simultaneous puncture through a unilateral posterolateral approach, so the vertical distance from the point of skin puncture to the posterior median line, as well as the puncture angle, were measured using the MRI. The results were used to guide the PVP operation. We compared these two groups based on the average time for a single vertebra operation, the achievement ratio of puncture, and the incidence of bone cement leakage during surgery. The mean follow-up period was 14.2 months (range 12 - 23 months). The pre- and post-operative visual analogue score (VAS) (3 and 12 months post-surgery), the variation of Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the incidence of long-term complications were also compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The average time of a single vertebra operation in groups A and B were (34.7 ± 5.4) and (23.3 ± 4.2) minutes, respectively. In groups A and B, the success rates of puncture were 74.1% and 91.7%, respectively. Postoperative reduction of the average VAS scores in groups A and B at 3 and 12 months post-surgery were 5.8 ± 2.1, 6.1 ± 1.8, 6.1 ± 2.0, 6.2 ± 1.6, respectively. However, the ODI increase was 41.6% ± 5.7%, 40.6% ± 6.0%, 46.3% ± 5.2%, 46.1% ± 6.7%. Paired t test evaluation of the values above showed a significant difference in the time of single-vertebra operation and the success rates between groups A and B (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was seen in the reduction of VAS scores and ODI (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>A preoperative MRI measurement effectively reduced the time of PVP with a unilateral puncture, which improved the success rate of the puncture without an additional risk of operation related complication.</p>

The anatomic study and clinical significance of the modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To put some improvements to the traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and discuss its clinical significance.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Completed the traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and TLIF procedure in 12 fresh cadavers, dissect further to expose the surrounding anatomical structures, and put the modified TLIF surgery according to the anatomical findings. And simulated the operation in 12 fresh cadavers, analyzed its feasibility and potential advantages.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The early anatomical study found that the related nerve root was in a state of high tension and certain risk of injury when completed the traditional PLIF and TLIF surgery, and found certain operational area between the superior articular process and the midline structures of the spinous processes and interspinous ligaments. Put the modified TLIF surgical approach according to the anatomical findings, which the operating area is located in PLIF outside and TLIF inside. As the following words: Take a posterior-middle incision, preserve the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments, and the spinous processes, dissect the bilateral paravertebral muscle, expose lamina and facet joints, not including transverse process, and remove unilateral inferior two third lamina, inferior articular process and expose the articular surface of the superior articular process, then dispose the intervertebral space for interbody fusion obliquely in the unilateral approach. Successfully completed the modified TLIF procedure in 12 fresh cadavers, the results showed that the technique has the following advantages. (1) Only remove unilateral inferior two third lamina and inferior articular process, preserve the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments, and the spinous processes, not expose the transverse process. (2) Both central canal, and lateral recess and nerve root canal of the operative side can be decompressed effectively simultaneously. (3) Avoid excessive traction to the thecal sac and traversing nerve roots and decrease the injury rate due to the reservation of the midline structures and the oblique manipulation, and less injury rate of the exiting nerve root, because of not necessary to expose it routinely.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The modified TLIF is safe and feasible, could effectively reduce the nerve roots injuries. Maybe it's a better choice for most of the Chinese patients at present.</p>

Appraise operative outcome for acute central cervical spinal cord injuries without fracture and dislocation / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate the surgical outcome for acute central cervical spinal cord injuries without fracture and dislocation.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective study was performed on 52 patients with acute central cervical cord injuries without fracture and dislocation from 2000 to 2005. All of patients underwent cervical anterior or posterior decompression, fusion and inter fixation. Spinal function was evaluated by ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) guidelines. Pre- and post-operation ASIA scores were analyzed using liner correlation and regression. The neurological function was recorded during followed-up. The average follow-up was 29 months (range, 12 to 42).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>After operation, the ASIA scores increased significantly (P<0.01). Finally, ASIA motor, pin pricking and light touching scores of the 41 patients were 91 +/- 7, 107 +/- 6 and 107 +/- 6 respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Decompression and inter fixation for injured segment can make a stable and broad space for spinal cord, promoting early neurological recovery and long-term improvement.</p>